- Apr 25
Algorithm ranks peer reviewers by reputation — but critics warn of bias
- Apr 17
Researchers want a ‘nutrition label’ for academic-paper facts
- Apr 16
Revealed: the ten research papers that policy documents cite most
- Apr 11
Is ChatGPT corrupting peer review? Telltale words hint at AI use
- Apr 9
A key chemistry journal disappeared from the web. Others are at risk
- Apr 5
Gates Foundation mandates preprints
- Mar 26
Larger or longer grants unlikely to push senior scientists towards high-risk, high-reward work
- Mar 15
Why is plagiarism apparently more common in research funded by the NSF than the NIH?
- Feb 11
COVID’s preprint bump set to have lasting effect on research publishing
- Feb 8
Fake research papers flagged by analysing authorship trends
- Jan 19
Is the academic social networking site ResearchGate still relevant?
- Jan 11
Self-citations in around a dozen countries are unusually high
- Jan 5
US project seeks standard way to communicate research retractions
- Dec 28, 2023
Kathryn Harkup: science communicator, best-selling author, and goth enthusiast
- Dec 19, 2023
Has your research influenced policy? Use this free tool to check
- Dec 7, 2023
US agency launches experiments to find innovative ways to fund research
- Nov 28, 2023
UAE university breaks ties with beleaguered nanoscientist
- Nov 20, 2023
Exposing a most unscrupulous journal
- Oct 19, 2023
Malaysia won’t pay for researchers to publish in certain journals
- Oct 11, 2023
Crystallography Databases Hunt for Fraudulent Structures
- Oct 11, 2023
How thousands of invisible citations sneak into papers and make for fake metrics
- Sep 20, 2023
Crossref acquires Retraction Watch Database
- Sep 15, 2023
Science publishers settle lawsuits with ResearchGate
- Sep 13, 2023
Former Cornell scientists made up data in 12 research studies
- Sep 1, 2023
Chemist made-up data in 4 NIH grant applications
- Sep 1, 2023
One academic paper’s journey through the mill
- Sep 1, 2023
Women scientists are less likely than men to submit papers to high-impact journals
- Aug 29, 2023
Flawed chemistry papers can take more than a year to be retracted
- Jul 18, 2023
Small gap found in error reporting at JACS
- Jul 4, 2023
Preprints become papers less often when the authors are from lower-income countries
- Jun 15, 2023
Nick Wise, Scientific Sleuth and Fluid Dynamics Researcher
- Jun 12, 2023
Nobel Prize winner Gregg Semenza retracts another study
- Jun 5, 2023
The OPCW’s never-ending fight to eliminate chemical weapons
- May 25, 2023
Survey Finds Cheating Is Common in Graduate School
- May 17, 2023
Dedicated committee needed to tackle research reproducibility problems in the UK
- May 9, 2023
Prominent nanoscientist retracts paper after PhD students flagged error
- May 9, 2023
Researchers who agree to manipulate citations are more likely to get their papers published
- May 9, 2023
Chemist in India loses seven papers, blames outsourcing of images
- Apr 21, 2023
New tool detects papers originating from paper mills
- Apr 21, 2023
Earthquake destroyed data, claims Japanese prof found to have faked results
- Apr 7, 2023
Highly-cited chemist is suspended for claiming to be affiliated with Russian and Saudi universities
- Apr 7, 2023
Five years after saying it won’t retract Macchiarini paper, journal does so
- Mar 26, 2023
Exclusive: Australia space scientist made up data, probe finds
- Mar 15, 2023
‘Spell-checker for statistics’ reduces errors in the psychology literature
- Mar 8, 2023
‘Elite university’ strategies might boost profile and rankings — but at what cost?
- Mar 7, 2023
French National Center for Scientific Research faulted over chemistry lab misconduct probe
- Mar 6, 2023
A Conversation with Renee Wegrzyn, inaugural director of ARPA-H
- Feb 27, 2023
Chemistry bots under threat from changes to Twitter’s API rules
- Feb 24, 2023
US Office of Research Integrity received 269 allegations of research misconduct last fiscal year
- Feb 24, 2023
‘Golden tickets’ on the cards for NSF grant reviewers